Post by nijhumnishita033 on Jan 11, 2024 2:38:23 GMT -5
income may have been higher than what he himself declares, which "would justify the availability of greater solvency that would result in the eventual reduction in income having been temporary and not having produced frustration." of the purpose of the contract.” Taking this into account, he concludes that "it is reasonable that an expert report prepared by an economist or accountant would have been provided that would precisely justify the losses and their consequences." The ruling also highlights that the most recent jurisprudence requires, in similar cases.
That the party seeking to modify the economic conditions of the contract must qualitatively and quantitatively prove how the pandemic has affected its business, by providing an expert opinion prepared by an economist Phone Number Data who makes a comparison between income, not only in the year of the pandemic, but in previous years.Thus, the Court of First Instance no . rest ” suffered by the actor. Mario Bonacho Caballero , lawyer responsible for the Corporate Reputation Defense area and the Crimes against Privacy area at AVERUM Abogados , and specialized in the area of the Right to Honor, Privacy and Own Image, has assumed the technical direction of this procedure .
In this sense, remember that articles 24 and 117.3 of the Constitution guarantee the right of citizens to obtain resolutions based on Law and issued by a judge or court. That is, to have your case resolved by a “person-judge.” The proposed opinion also indicates that the CGPJ cannot be deviated from in a matter that involves the processing and exchange of personal data and that, therefore, requires evaluations and controls that prevent a possible deviation from the purpose of the information processing. The General Council of the Judiciary, remember, holds the status of control authority in the processing of data for jurisdictional purposes.