Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 0:05:02 GMT -5
These mutual children lived with their father before the case, during the case, and stated that they wanted to live with their father in the social investigation report received by the court, and they also stated that they wanted to stay with their father at the hearing dated 08/05/2018. In the social investigation report dated 04/04/2018 received by the court, it was stated that it would be appropriate to give custody of the joint children to the father. is not at the age of perception . Although the joint child is at an age where maternal love and attention is needed, in the social examination report received; The defendant mother's relatives could not support her in the care of the children , the defendant had the idea of working and if she worked, she thought of leaving little D to the caretaker or other people - neighbors , she was observed to be anxious and indecisive about her future, and the plaintiff father; Considering the fact that there is no allegation or evidence that the child will abuse his/her custody duties, that their parents support them in the care of the children,
And that the children at the age of understanding state that France Telegram Number Data their mothers have treated them badly in the past, it is stated that it would be in the best interest of the child to give custody to the father, and that the siblings should be separated from each other. These mutual children lived with their father before the case, during the case, and stated that they wanted to live with their father in the social investigation report received by the court, and they also stated that they wanted to stay with their father at the hearing dated 08/05/2018. In the social investigation report dated 04/04/2018 received by the court, it was stated that it would be appropriate to give custody of the joint children to the father.
The joint child D, born on 16/06/2016, is not at the age of perception . Although the joint child is at an age where maternal love and attention is needed, in the social examination report received; The defendant mother's relatives could not support her in the care of the children , the defendant had the idea of working and if she worked, she thought of leaving little D to the caretaker or other people - neighbors , she was observed to be anxious and indecisive about her future, and the plaintiff father; Considering the fact that there is no allegation or evidence that the child will abuse his/her custody duties, that their parents support them in the care of the children, and that the children at the age of understanding state that their mothers have treated them badly in the past, it is stated that it would be in the best interest of the child to give custody to the father, and that the siblings should be separated from each other.
And that the children at the age of understanding state that France Telegram Number Data their mothers have treated them badly in the past, it is stated that it would be in the best interest of the child to give custody to the father, and that the siblings should be separated from each other. These mutual children lived with their father before the case, during the case, and stated that they wanted to live with their father in the social investigation report received by the court, and they also stated that they wanted to stay with their father at the hearing dated 08/05/2018. In the social investigation report dated 04/04/2018 received by the court, it was stated that it would be appropriate to give custody of the joint children to the father.
The joint child D, born on 16/06/2016, is not at the age of perception . Although the joint child is at an age where maternal love and attention is needed, in the social examination report received; The defendant mother's relatives could not support her in the care of the children , the defendant had the idea of working and if she worked, she thought of leaving little D to the caretaker or other people - neighbors , she was observed to be anxious and indecisive about her future, and the plaintiff father; Considering the fact that there is no allegation or evidence that the child will abuse his/her custody duties, that their parents support them in the care of the children, and that the children at the age of understanding state that their mothers have treated them badly in the past, it is stated that it would be in the best interest of the child to give custody to the father, and that the siblings should be separated from each other.